Reviewer List
Please send your CV at [email protected] , [email protected]
|
Dr. Michael Asante, |
|
Dr. Ahmed Nabih Zaki Rashed |
|
Dr. Muralibhaskran Venugopal |
|
Dr. Nazrulazhar Bahaman |
|
Aliabbas Petiwala |
|
Siti Rahayu Selamat |
|
Dr. Rohit Manjule |
|
Prof. Debabrata Samanta |
|
Dr. Asha Gowda Karegowda |
|
Prof. Milind U. Nemade |
|
Dr. Muralibhaskran Venugopal |
|
Dr. Nazrulazhar Bahaman |
|
Dr.K.A.Lathief |
|
Siti Rahayu Selamat |
|
Dr.Vuda Sreenivasa Rao |
|
Prof. Avinash Jadhav |
|
Dr.J.Prabhakaran |
|
Dr. Salim Y. Amdani |
|
Dr.Govindaraj Thangavel |
|
Dr. Sanjay Gaur |
|
Dr. Arun Sharma |
|
Boubker Sbihi |
|
Veeramanickam. M.R.M |
|
Dr. Aznul Qalid Md Sabri |
|
Hemant Palivela |
|
Ms.Namrata S.Baghele |
|
Shailendra M. Pardeshi |
|
Sumeet Vinchurkar |
|
Sandip R.Sonawane |
|
Prof. Dipak Wajgi |
|
Prof. Deepak Kapgate |
|
Prof. Saikumar Tara |
|
Romana Riyaz Wani |
|
Sarada Prasad Pradhan |
|
Koteswararao Seelam |
|
Dr. Kamlesh Kumar Dhiwar |
|
Dr. S.Anupama Kumar |
|
Dr. Vikram Vishal |
|
Dr. K. R.Ananth |
|
Er. Sumeet Vinchurkar |
|
Dr.Vijayalakshmi.M.N |
|
Prof. Parul Bhanarkar Jha |
|
Prof. S.Prasath |
|
Hossein Heidari |
|
Prof. Disha Sharma Sengupta. |
|
Dr. Nilesh J. Uke |
|
Prof. Chandu D.Vaidhya. |
|
Mr.R.Vinoth |
|
Prof. Raja S. |
|
Prof. Nilesh R. Pardeshi. |
|
Ms.Namrata S.Baghele |
|
Balajee Maram |
|
Amol Potgantwar |
|
Houari Boudjella |
|
Shadab Pattekari |
|
Dr. J. Prabhakaran |
|
Fu-Chienkao |
|
Boudjella Houari |
|
Balajee Maram |
|
Dr.Vuda Sreenivasa Rao |
|
Prof. Dr.Govindaraj Thangavel |
|
Dr. Salim Y. Amdani |
|
Dr. H N Suresh |
|
Dr. Kiran D. Patil |
|
Lusekelo Kibona |
|
Vijaykumar Chalwa |
|
Prof. Dipak Wajgi |
|
Prof. Deepak Kapgate |
|
Prof. Saikumar Tara |
|
Romana Riyaz Wani |
|
Sarada Prasad Pradhan |
|
Koteswararao Seelam |
|
Dr. T.N. Singh, |
|
Dr. K.R.Ananth |
|
Dr.Md.Tabrez Quasim |
|
Dr. Neeraj Lata |
|
Dr.Sai Satyanarayana Reddy Seelam |
|
Prof. Bharathi Malakreddy |
|
Prof. Sagar Jirapure |
|
Prof. Ashwini Abhale |
|
Prof. Amol Bhosle |
|
Prof. Ajay B. Gadicha |
|
Prof. Pankaj Bharne |
|
Mr. Dnyaneshwar Natha Wavhal. |
|
Mr. Piyush D. Hegu |
Role of Reviewer
Aim
As stated in our site, "Instruction to Author",...referees will be asked to judge whether the article contributes sufficiently to our knowledge and/or understanding of wells...'
While the guidelines primarily directed at the reviewers of articles, we encourage prospective authors of articles for the Well Reviewed stream to read them in order to gain a better understanding of the elements, which the reviewer will be looking for.
Nature of role
This is a voluntary position, and there is no remuneration related to the post.
Reviewer's Role: Responsibility To Authors
The role of the reviewer in relation to the author is to provide written feedback on the scholarship of their article. This will necessarily require you to apply our defined criteria, but we ask you to approach this in a positive way, to make this a constructive and beneficial exercise for the author concerned. At least one reviewer of each article will be familiar with the subject area covered.
Reviewer's Role: Responsibility To Editors
Another role of the reviewer is to inform the editors about the suitability of the article for inclusion in the peer-reviewed section of IJAFRC. The article will only be published in the Well Reviewed stream if the reviewers deem it to be of a 'sufficiently' high quality of scholarship. By ensuring high standards in the submissions for this stream,
We would like a brief written report ( email is acceptable) advising us whether the article should be
- Accepted as it stands.
- Accepted subject to minor revisions.
- Accepted subject to major revisions.
Reviewer's role: Responsibility To Readers
If the author agrees to let your comments appear, we would like you to submit a brief written report for inclusion in paper alongside the reviewed article. We are particularly keen to promote this approach, which reflects the open ethos of the internet published journal. Used constructively, to promote open discussion and debate, this initiative can break down the barriers between author and reviewer, and between academics and non-academics.
Points to consider
Please consider the following questions when you review articles for IJAFRC
- Does the title reflect the content appropriately?
- Does the abstract describe the content accurately?
- Are the objectives clearly stated?
- Is the argument expressed clearly, strongly and convincingly?
- Is the article well structured?
- Are there any irrelevant sections?
- Is the field adequately covered? Are there any relevant areas that should have been included?
- Is the article well-supported with bibliographic and other authoritative sources?
- Is the information, or the interpretation of the information, new?
- Is the information factually correct?
- Are the conclusions supported by the discussion?
- Are the supporting illustrations/graphs/other media well chosen? Do they add impact to the article?
Appointed by
Editorial Executive
Application process
Members are drawn from the pool of reviewers. CV and covering letter to editor.
Appointment period
Normally three years
Eligibility
- Expertise in Computer Engineering education practice and /or research
- Experience of peer review welcome, but not essential
Reviewers are expected to
- Familiarise themselves with the IJAFRC submission and review system
- Promote the journal within professional networks
- Review between two and four articles in any calendar year
- Respond promptly to requests for reviews [within five days]
- Complete and return reviews promptly [within four weeks]
- Respect confidentiality at all times
- Notify the editor of any change of email address
- Notify the editor if, for any reason, it is not possible to carry out reviewing duties
- Notify the editor if they are the author, or co-author, of an article submitted for consideration
Benefits
Successful applicants can add their role as a reviewer for the International Journal of Advance Foundation and Research in Computer (IJAFRC) to their CV